Submission

I am very happy with the project we have managed to complete. It was a very ambitious project however we managed to complete the project in time and still achieve the look and feel we wanted. Our project looked professional and included high quality models.

We had to compress our film using QuickTime and thus the quality was significantly reduced and in areas there was some pixelation which I was not too happy about, however there was no way around this problem as our film was very large in terms of memory. Despite this I am very happy with the overall outcome. I am also pleased that almost every single model was included in the finished film and barely anything was scrapped.

Feedback

Today our film received some very promising feedback from both tutors and students. We were complemented on our use of effective and consistent lighting. Many individuals thought that our sound effects were also effective in terms of quality, and realism and seemed to go well with the imagery. We were also told that our way of exploring the environment with each shot was mature as it allowed the viewer to absorb the layout of the environment and that a narrative was apparent within our short film which followed the journey of the dump truck. Students explained that this made our short film more engaging.

Project Evaluation & Learning Outcomes

This project has been a massive learning experience in terms of time management, communication, techniques and skills. It certainly informed me of how the Industry works.

I thouroughly enjoyed this project as it was a subject that suited my interests, however this project also provided me with the opportunity to learn from other team members skilled in different areas. I learnt a lot regarding modeling, and I believe I have greatly improved in building 3D models within Maya. I have learnt how to apply textures to my models effectively using the UV Planar Mapping function so as to avoid nasty stretched textures. I now understand the way the hyper-shade editor works and how important it is to name every different texture.

I have learnt how to carry out simple animations. I have learnt how to set up cameras and change their projections and settings. I have learnt the basics about setting up lights within Maya and how to change from one type of light to another as well as changing their settings to light my models effectively and suggest form using light and shadow. This project has also improved my concept design skills in Photoshop, it has improved my compositing skills in Adobe After Effects and I feel more comfortable using the program. I believe that I have become more proficient in editing in as far as timing, rhythm and tempo between shots. I am now more familiar with Final Cut Pro.

This experience was a sometimes stressful yet enjoyable one and will undoubtedly help me next term and has informed me of what to expect next year during the third year. I was fortunate to work with such a talented yet friendly group of individuals who were determined to finish the project. We all had a shared vision and the end product demonstrates that we gelled well as a team. This project has also made me realise how much more I enjoy working in a group. This project has also showed me of the different processes needed in order to create an entirely 3D environment and how much work must be put in in order to achieve the desired product.

Individual Evaluation

As an individual I believe I contributed well within the group. I took part in almost every different task so as to get the most out of the project and learn from my team members so as to improve on my own skills and develop entirely new ones. The one thing I think I did particularly well within the group was keeping everyone in the loop within the team. I dedicated a lot of my time in maintaining communication between each team member and making sure to boost team morale when needed and make sure a member knew when they had done a good job. I believe my time management was excellent and my organisation skills superb as I never became behind schedule. I was always clear on what I had to do and what I needed to do in order to get it done. I made sure that I finished work on time so that it would not hold up the rest of the group. I also had a clear vision of the look and feel of our environment which Andy had imagined. Thus we all had a shared vision of the environment and so continuity was spot on. I suggested solutions to problems, and suggested ways of making something better. I was above all a useful team member who was prepared to try something new and help out other individuals within the group. I was open to suggestions and new ideas.

As an individual I learnt a lot from this project both in terms of time management and communication to the more technical side in terms of techniques and skills.

The one thing that I should critisise myself for was the fact that I spent too long focusing on the conceptual stage. In the future I must remember to realsise that there is more than just conceptual design. Despite the rather long pre-production stage however, we still managed to finish our project, yet it is something to bare in mind. Having said this I came up with various designs and worked well as a conceptual artist and I believe I contributed to the designs of various elements within the environment. I gathered substantial amounts of research for the team and explored various environment designs. My storyboards however were probably the most important pieces of work within the group as these strongly influenced the final look of the film itself.

Team Evaluation

I believe that our final animated environment/ short film demonstrates how well we gelled as a team. I was fortunate to be in such a talented yet friendly group. We occasionally had our differences however we did not let it get in the way of our work and we very quickly put our differences aside and got on with the task in hand, usually by helping one another and suggesting solutions to various problems. We kept calm and patient and thus the workflow was not affected. At lunch we would have a laugh and suggest new ideas or decide the next plan of action or set of tasks needed to be completed. As a group we worked really well together and this can be demonstrated on how well we communicated with each-other and how well we all managed our time and finish the short film on time. I believe we worked so well as a group because we all helped each-other with the work load and did not allocate a role to a specific individual. For example we did not rely on one member within the group to complete modeling tasks by himself. We did not have one member working on texturing and the other animating and rendering. We all had a part to play in every development stage within the project. We all learnt from one another on this project in terms of acquiring or developing skills. If something went wrong we would always suggests new ways to tackle the problem and we assessed the situation and usually had a plan B or C. For instance we made sure that each of us had copies of the project files so that if a computer was to malfunction or if data was corrupted we would always have spare files. We also developed an understanding between one another and I believe that our relationship between each-other was a huge factor to the success of our team and the finished film.

Problems & Solutions

Communication:

Communication was one of the first problems we had as a group, however we quickly remedied this problem by exchanging mobile phone numbers and e-mails. W also decided to use online messaging applications such as MSN & Skype.

Texturing:

We have had some issues regarding textures when attempting to import a scene from another computer. This seems to be a rather annoying and frequent problem. One way we have solved this is to manually re-assign the textures, but this takes up valuable time. The other day Dan showed me and Tom a way to set the textures by setting the project scene and its textures under source images rather than documents. I have to say that I do not yet fully understand how the texture system works. I also understand that other students have been experiencing similar problems.

Rendering:

The other problem is that some of our scenes are far too complex for our laptops to render in terms of polygons and information. Sometimes it is due to a lack of memory or RAM. However we have solved this problem by dismissing the fly-through approach and exploring the environment by using numerous shots. Thus we do not have to render all the components within a single shot. We have also taken this a stage further by making sure that any environment components not visible within the camera frame are deleted to cut down render time and lag/ delay issues. There is no point in including elements which the viewer cannot see. This is precisely what they do in film, however from the experience on this project, I have realised that using this technique is even more important when it comes to CG 3D environments.

We have discovered that we cannot use the render farm effectively as Qube is only compatible with mental ray and only works with .tiff format textures. We have used many .jpg when texturing, and it would be a painstakingly slow process of re-formating hundreds of textures. There were literally thousands of errors that we would have to had to address. It has also come to my attention that during the last weeks Qube buckled under the pressure of too many projects being uploaded to be rendered which exceeded the memory limit. Numerous projects which were 4 Gb and over crashed the render farm, thus this is another reason why it was a good decision to render locally on our own laptops. Due to these problems we as a group made a conscious decision to render out each scene using our own laptop computers.

We have also decided not to render our scenes with an occlusion layer as we discovered that rendering this layer almost doubled render time. The result did not look too different from the

renders without an occlusion layer. The only way we could include an occlusion layer was by either rendering different layers separately of the same scene on several laptops simultaneously or the the render farm Qube was an option however I have already explained the issue with this method. So we decided to render without an occlusion render in order to cut down on render time.

Progress

I admit that there were on occasions, moments where I thought we were not going to complete our animated environment project or complete it to our liking and we may have spent a week more on concept design than we should have, but in my opinion this extra week provided us with adequate time to come up with some interesting designs. We supported and helped each-other to come up with solutions to quickly remedy a problem. Generally after these scares we focused our concentration and consequently completed a lot of work within a day, which provided a sense of accomplishment. Our project is a particularly ambitious one and has become a rather daunting project to complete during these last few weeks. It will be all the more rewarding once we finish the project.

Below is perhaps my favourite shot of the whole film. This is because of its simple composition, superb lighting, high quality texturing and effective bump mapping. This shot is also very faithful to the original concept and storyboard. It almost looks as good as something from a game. I am very happy with this shot.

Sound Effects

I contributed a lot to the sound effects within our environment. Indeed, without sound I believe our environment would have been very dull despite the nice visuals. The sound effects certainly added a new dimension to the environment and introduced far more weight to each shot. The sound effects not only created an interesting atmosphere to surround the environment but also injected life into each shot.

I used sound effects to suggest things happening out of frame and thus enhance the visual experience. I attempted to use sound to make the environment seem larger, believable and realistic as possible. I wanted the sound to suggest animation both seen and unseen. For example I wanted tank track sound effects to be heard despite the fact that in some scenes the dump truck's wheels were not animated. I wanted the sounds to inform the viewer of how large the scale was of our environment. The wind sound effects worked extraordinarily well with the dust layers and certainly improved the exterior shots. I focused on using sound effects that would fit in the environment. I wanted the viewer to think that the sounds they were hearing belonged to the objects that were making them.

To me sound is 75% of the experience and I wanted it just right. Sound edited effectively can do wonders and enhance the visuals ten fold. I know we are not being graded on sound however not putting sound on to the final edit would have been a disappointment and would not have done the environment any favors. The sound files were perhaps the most expensive thing out of the whole project. All the sounds roughly cost about $30.

Adobe After Effects & Compositing

Here are some shots I managed to finish today in After Effects.

I really like the way this static shot came out. Although it is static, the dust layer really brings this shot to life

This was a tough scene to do as I had to parent and animate the background layer and dust layer to the 3D desert terrain. It looks like a relatively simple shot however there are a lot of layers here. I took a photograph of my Dad's car's dashboard which can be seen at the bottom left of the screen, I believe this provides something familiar to the scene which the viewer can relate to, it also makes the interior less empty and more interesting and realistic. I also took film of a swinging card pass which hangs from the roof of the cockpit of the vehicle. This adds movement and additional animation to make the scene more interesting and to inject a little life to an otherwise dull scene. I also filmed a movie of my Dad to create the driver's reflection. This too helps to bring life to the film. The cockpit windscreen is a basic layer made in photoshop which was animated in adobe after effects to depict the illusion of uneven terrain and to give a sense of the motion of the vehicle. I also added soot near the corners of the panes of glass as extra detail to make the vehicle used and weathered. I was very pleased how the smoke/ dust layer turned out too. It was used throughout the short film, and helps to convey weather and enhance the atmosphere of the environment.

I was concerned that the sky was a little too pink so Tom and I graded it so that the background was more orange thus creating the illusion that the vehicle had orange tinted glass. This was as they say, a happy accident and seems to fit rather nicely. This scene looks quite decent and adds a new dimension to the film, it also seems to humanise the environment too.

Rendering

I was very happy with the render below. It is very close to that of the original shot in the storyboards. The reason why I like it so much is because of the use of lighting which illuminates areas of the communications mast, yet not revealing the poor texture that is applied. In fact, the poor texture is not really visible. This is why lighting can be so important.